<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google AdWords ACTUAL image sizes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bannersnack.com/blog/google-adwords-actual-image-sizes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bannersnack.com/blog/google-adwords-actual-image-sizes/</link>
	<description>On Banner Advertising and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 07:00:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.bannersnack.com/blog/google-adwords-actual-image-sizes/comment-page-1/#comment-39465</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 07:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bannersnack.com/blog/?p=1865#comment-39465</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this. It is a bit shocking to see your add all squished on someone&#039;s site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this. It is a bit shocking to see your add all squished on someone&#8217;s site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nyc escort service</title>
		<link>http://www.bannersnack.com/blog/google-adwords-actual-image-sizes/comment-page-1/#comment-31591</link>
		<dc:creator>nyc escort service</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 22:55:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bannersnack.com/blog/?p=1865#comment-31591</guid>
		<description>I have to let you know, you are friggin on. I came 2 your website from some other friend and am heavily interested in this niche and finding more info. Do you mind if I comment to this site from my newsletter?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to let you know, you are friggin on. I came 2 your website from some other friend and am heavily interested in this niche and finding more info. Do you mind if I comment to this site from my newsletter?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DSLR Camera</title>
		<link>http://www.bannersnack.com/blog/google-adwords-actual-image-sizes/comment-page-1/#comment-14993</link>
		<dc:creator>DSLR Camera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 02:05:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bannersnack.com/blog/?p=1865#comment-14993</guid>
		<description>The banner sizes is really a pain. I&#039;ve followed your instrucitons above and also saw the post on google for the sizes. Every time I try to submit an ad in these sizes I get an error stating that it is an incorrect size.

So, I create my ad&#039;s in the size you indicate above ant then stretch it vertically to the correct size. So it looks out of wack. Then when google shrinks it, it looks right.

Google needs to fix this!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The banner sizes is really a pain. I&#8217;ve followed your instrucitons above and also saw the post on google for the sizes. Every time I try to submit an ad in these sizes I get an error stating that it is an incorrect size.</p>
<p>So, I create my ad&#8217;s in the size you indicate above ant then stretch it vertically to the correct size. So it looks out of wack. Then when google shrinks it, it looks right.</p>
<p>Google needs to fix this!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Creator</title>
		<link>http://www.bannersnack.com/blog/google-adwords-actual-image-sizes/comment-page-1/#comment-14549</link>
		<dc:creator>Creator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 07:26:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bannersnack.com/blog/?p=1865#comment-14549</guid>
		<description>Nick, you are right. Problem is, they only accept the ancient ActionScript 2.0 standard. Of course, the SWF doesn&#039;t HAVE to be animated after all...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick, you are right. Problem is, they only accept the ancient ActionScript 2.0 standard. Of course, the SWF doesn&#8217;t HAVE to be animated after all&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nick</title>
		<link>http://www.bannersnack.com/blog/google-adwords-actual-image-sizes/comment-page-1/#comment-14521</link>
		<dc:creator>nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 20:24:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bannersnack.com/blog/?p=1865#comment-14521</guid>
		<description>even better, sometimes google will give the ad to doubleclick and doubleclick uses the IAB standard sizes, so they will stretch your 300x239 rectangle back to 300x250.

the solution is to give google .swf files instead of images.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>even better, sometimes google will give the ad to doubleclick and doubleclick uses the IAB standard sizes, so they will stretch your 300&#215;239 rectangle back to 300&#215;250.</p>
<p>the solution is to give google .swf files instead of images.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
