<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Crisis doesn&#8217;t seem to affect banner advertising</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bannersnack.com/blog/crisis-doesnt-seem-to-affect-banner-advertising/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bannersnack.com/blog/crisis-doesnt-seem-to-affect-banner-advertising/</link>
	<description>On Banner Advertising and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2011 14:20:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crisis doesn’t seem to affect banner advertising II &#124; BannerSnack Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.bannersnack.com/blog/crisis-doesnt-seem-to-affect-banner-advertising/comment-page-1/#comment-4791</link>
		<dc:creator>Crisis doesn’t seem to affect banner advertising II &#124; BannerSnack Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 13:44:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bannersnack.com/blog/?p=1317#comment-4791</guid>
		<description>[...] is the very first time I see something like this, even though if you think about the 300&#215;600 px banner, the banner doesn&#8217;d seem to look that outrageously [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is the very first time I see something like this, even though if you think about the 300&#215;600 px banner, the banner doesn&#8217;d seem to look that outrageously [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

