<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top 5 advantages of AS3 over AS2(or why should Google AdWords accept ActionScript 3.0 banners)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bannersnack.com/blog/advantages-of-as3-vs-as2-why-should-google-adwords-accept-actionscript-3-banners/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bannersnack.com/blog/advantages-of-as3-vs-as2-why-should-google-adwords-accept-actionscript-3-banners/</link>
	<description>On Banner Advertising and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 07:00:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.bannersnack.com/blog/advantages-of-as3-vs-as2-why-should-google-adwords-accept-actionscript-3-banners/comment-page-1/#comment-36183</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 21:51:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bannersnack.com/blog/?p=2375#comment-36183</guid>
		<description>The reason AS2 is still around is because it is easy to work with.  What took one line of code to accomplish, now takes seven or more.  Most users are not programmers.  

Yes, it is faster, more flexible and all the rest.  But many users will be removed from the Flash community when there is only AS3.  Most coders would probably like this, but not the software developers.  

David, an AS2 user.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reason AS2 is still around is because it is easy to work with.  What took one line of code to accomplish, now takes seven or more.  Most users are not programmers.  </p>
<p>Yes, it is faster, more flexible and all the rest.  But many users will be removed from the Flash community when there is only AS3.  Most coders would probably like this, but not the software developers.  </p>
<p>David, an AS2 user.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: song guanyu</title>
		<link>http://www.bannersnack.com/blog/advantages-of-as3-vs-as2-why-should-google-adwords-accept-actionscript-3-banners/comment-page-1/#comment-29353</link>
		<dc:creator>song guanyu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 May 2010 14:32:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bannersnack.com/blog/?p=2375#comment-29353</guid>
		<description>hi I am more inclined to seo google adwords, but now I am doing B to C to be closed in the powerful google,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi I am more inclined to seo google adwords, but now I am doing B to C to be closed in the powerful google,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raul</title>
		<link>http://www.bannersnack.com/blog/advantages-of-as3-vs-as2-why-should-google-adwords-accept-actionscript-3-banners/comment-page-1/#comment-19959</link>
		<dc:creator>Raul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 11:10:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bannersnack.com/blog/?p=2375#comment-19959</guid>
		<description>They&#039;re too lazy to do so... 

Lazy Google guys made Flash look bad to people since all they see is AS2 that crashes browsers and slows them down, no cool transitions can be made, no bitmap effects, can&#039;t make a decent Flash banner in AS2 while keeping a low file size and low processor consuming...

Their requirements address only type and file size (AS2 SWF, less than 50Kb), and here is why everybody now is pushing the code limit, now AS2 banners all they do is increase processing levels, slowing computers down and crashing browsers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They&#8217;re too lazy to do so&#8230; </p>
<p>Lazy Google guys made Flash look bad to people since all they see is AS2 that crashes browsers and slows them down, no cool transitions can be made, no bitmap effects, can&#8217;t make a decent Flash banner in AS2 while keeping a low file size and low processor consuming&#8230;</p>
<p>Their requirements address only type and file size (AS2 SWF, less than 50Kb), and here is why everybody now is pushing the code limit, now AS2 banners all they do is increase processing levels, slowing computers down and crashing browsers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.bannersnack.com/blog/advantages-of-as3-vs-as2-why-should-google-adwords-accept-actionscript-3-banners/comment-page-1/#comment-19857</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 19:32:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bannersnack.com/blog/?p=2375#comment-19857</guid>
		<description>I understand and acknowledge that AS3 is by far more advanced than AS2. However, I havent seen a reason posted anywhere for this cause as to why Google Adwords will not accept AS3? They must have a legit reason for doing so.

Can someone explain this to me?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand and acknowledge that AS3 is by far more advanced than AS2. However, I havent seen a reason posted anywhere for this cause as to why Google Adwords will not accept AS3? They must have a legit reason for doing so.</p>
<p>Can someone explain this to me?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave G.</title>
		<link>http://www.bannersnack.com/blog/advantages-of-as3-vs-as2-why-should-google-adwords-accept-actionscript-3-banners/comment-page-1/#comment-19681</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave G.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 15:47:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bannersnack.com/blog/?p=2375#comment-19681</guid>
		<description>AS2 sucks big time, why do they still support AS2 and drop support for IE6? If it&#039;s about supporting only the new and better technology, AS3 should be up for 4 years now...

They&#039;re just loosing customers and they don&#039;t even realize it. The bad quality of AS2 in youtube ads and other ads they promote around the web makes all these sites perform slower... AS2 is slow and slows down everything</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AS2 sucks big time, why do they still support AS2 and drop support for IE6? If it&#8217;s about supporting only the new and better technology, AS3 should be up for 4 years now&#8230;</p>
<p>They&#8217;re just loosing customers and they don&#8217;t even realize it. The bad quality of AS2 in youtube ads and other ads they promote around the web makes all these sites perform slower&#8230; AS2 is slow and slows down everything</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
